The management of retrorectal tumors - a single-center analysis of 21 cases and overview of the literature.

AIM: Retrorectal tumors are rare and heterogeneous. They are often asymptomatic or present with nonspecific symptoms, making management challenging. This study examines the diagnosis and treatment of retrorectal tumors. METHODS: Between 2002 and 2022, 21 patients with retrorectal tumors were treated in our department. We analyzed patient characteristics, diagnosis and treatment modalities retrospectively. Additionally, a literature review (2002-2023, "retrorectal tumors" and "presacral tumors", 20 or more cases included) was performed. RESULTS: Of the 21 patients (median age 54 years, 62% female), 17 patients (81%) suffered from benign lesions and 4 (19%) from malignant lesions. Symptoms were mostly nonspecific, with pain being the most common (11/21 (52%)). Diagnosis was incidental in eight cases. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 20 (95%) and biopsy was obtained in 10 (48%). Twenty patients underwent surgery, mostly via a posterior approach (14/20 (70%)). At a mean follow-up of 42 months (median 10 months, range 1-166 months), the local recurrence rate was 19%. There was no mortality. Our Pubmed search identified 39 publications. CONCLUSION: Our data confirms the significant heterogeneity of retrorectal tumors, which poses a challenge to management, especially considering the often nonspecific symptoms. Regarding diagnosis and treatment, our data highlights the importance of MRI and surgical resection. In particular a malignancy rate of almost 20% warrants a surgical resection in case of the findings of a retrorectal tumour. A local recurrence rate of 19% supports the need for follow up.

Lateral pelvic lymph node positivity (LPLNP) score: predictive clinic-radiological model of lateral pelvic lymph node involvement in rectal cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The population in Western countries differs significantly from that in Eastern countries, and the prevalence of lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) involvement in Western populations remains largely unknown due to the limited application of LPLN dissection (LPLND). This discrepancy is primarily attributed to the higher body mass index commonly observed in Western populations, which increases the risk of intraoperative complications. Consequently, the aim of this study is to describe a specific Western clinico-radiological selection tool for LPLND, namely, the lateral pelvic lymph node positivity (LPLNP) score. METHODS: This retrospective single center study was designed to elaborate the LPLNP score, which was further tested on a prospective cohort of patients. Clinical and MRI factors associated with LPLN involvement were identified, and logistic regression was used to establish the LPLNP score. RESULTS: In the retrospective series, 120 patients underwent lateral pelvic lymph node dissection. After stepwise logistic regression, five parameters were ultimately included in the LPLNP score. When tested on 66 prospectively selected patients, 40 with an LPLNP score > 0.23 (corresponding to the highest sensitivity and specificity) underwent LPLND: 22 patients (55%) had pathologically confirmed positive LPLN. The negative predictive value of the LPLNP score was 96%, with a sensitivity of 95.7% and a specificity of 58.1%. CONCLUSION: The LPLNP score was developed based on the largest group of Western patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. This scoring system demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity during validation on the prospective series, correctly identifying LPLN involvement in 55% of cases.

Effect of radiotherapy on long-term quality of life in recurrence-free rectal cancer survivors (LaTE study): nationwide inverse probability of treatment-weighted registry-based cohort study and survey.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy reduces local recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer, but may cause harm in patients who do not experience recurrence. The aim was to investigate the impact of radiotherapy on long-term quality of life after curative treatment for rectal cancer, i.e. in patients without a recurrence during the follow-up. METHODS: All patients operated on for rectal cancer in Norway under 75 years of age between 30 September 2007 and 1 October 2020 were identified using the Cancer Registry of Norway. Exclusion criteria were distant metastasis, recurrence and dementia. The primary outcome measure was the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index. Secondary outcome measures included the 36-item Short Form Survey. Inverse probability weights based on a multiple logistic regression model were used to balance prechosen covariates between the radiotherapy and no radiotherapy groups when assessing differences in outcomes. RESULTS: Of 5014 invited patients, 2142 (43%) eligible patients answered the questionnaires. Of these 762 (36%) were treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy plus surgery and 1380 (64%) with surgery alone. The mean follow-up time was 6.4 and 7.4 years respectively. After propensity score matching, the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index differed significantly between irradiated and non-irradiated patients ((mean(s.d.), mean score 103.8(19.4) versus 110.8(19.6) respectively, mean difference: -6.96 (95% c.i. -8.72 to -5.19); P < 0.001). Among patients without a stoma the mean difference was -8.1 points, whereas it was -5.7 for patients with a stoma. The radiotherapy group also scored significantly lower in 7 of 8 36-item Short Form Survey domains compared with the surgery alone group. CONCLUSION: Long-term quality of life was significantly lower in patients without a recurrence during the follow-up who received radiotherapy compared with patients who did not. These findings warrant a critical re-evaluation of the use of radiotherapy both in traditional neoadjuvant treatment and in modern organ-preserving treatment regimens.

Advantages of robotic surgery for rectal cancer compared to laparoscopic surgery: pelvic anatomy and its impact on urinary dysfunction.

The anatomical dimensions and the shape of the pelvis influence surgical difficulty for rectal cancer. Compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery, robot-assisted surgery is expected to improve surgical outcomes due to the multi-joint movement of its surgical instruments. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of pelvic anatomical indicators on short-term outcomes of patients with rectal cancer. A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from 129 patients with rectal cancer who underwent conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection (L-LAR) or robot-assisted low anterior resection (R-LAR) with total mesorectal excision or tumor-specific mesorectal excision between January 2014 and December 2022. The transverse diameter of the lesser pelvis and the sacral promontory angle were used as indicators of pelvic anatomy. The sacral promontory angle was not associated with age and sex while the pelvic width was smaller in male than in female. The pelvic width did not affect postoperative complications in both L-LAR and R-LAR. In contrast, postoperative urinary dysfunction occurred more frequently in patients with a small sacral promontory angle (p = 0.005) in L-LAR although there was no impact on short-term outcomes in R-LAR. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a small sacral promontory angle was an independent predictive factor for urinary dysfunction (p = 0.032). Sharp angulation of the sacral promontory was a risk factor for UD after L-LAR. Robot-assisted surgery could overcome anatomical difficulties and reduce the incidence of UD.

Conventional versus high-voltage, long-term pulse Radiofrequency of ganglion impar in perineal pain with advanced rectal cancer: a Randomized, double-blind controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Advanced rectal cancer is a common cause of perineal pain and research on the use of radiofrequency therapy for the treatment of this pain is limited. In the present study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of conventional radiofrequency (CRF) and high-voltage long-term pulsed radiofrequency (H-PRF) of radiofrequency therapy in the management of perineal pain in advanced rectal cancer. DESIGN: Randomized, Double-Blind Controlled Trial. SETTING: Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute and Yanjiang District People's Hospital in Sichuan, China. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 72 patients with advanced rectal cancer experiencing perineal pain who were accepted for radiofrequency treatment. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were assigned randomly (1:1) assigned to either the group CRF or H-PRF in a double-blind trial. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary focus was on assessing perineal pain using numeric rating scales (NRS) scores at various time points. Secondary outcomes included the duration of maintaining a sitting position, depression scores, sleep quality, consumption of Oral Morphine Equivalent and Pregabalin, and the incidence of perineal numbness. A total of 57 patients (28 patients in the group CRF and 29 patients in the group H-PRF) were investigated. At all observation time points postoperatively, both groups of patients exhibited significant reductions in pain, enhancements in depression, improvements in sleep quality, and increased duration of sitting compared to their baseline measurements (P<0.05). During the 3 months and 6 months follow-up period, the group CRF exhibited significant reduction in pain, improvement in depression, sleep quality, and increased the time of keeping a sitting position compared with the group H-PRF (P<0.05). The consumption of oral morphine equivalent and Pregabalin as well as the incidence of perineal numbness were not significantly different between groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that application of CRF and H-PRF in ganglion impar to reduce perineal pain and improve the quality of life of patients with advanced rectal cancer is safe and effective. However, the long-term effect of CRF is better compared with that of H-PRF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.chictr.org.cn/ (ChiCTR2200061800) on 02/07/2022. This study adheres to CONSORT guidelines.

Robotic purse-string suture technique for intracorporeal anastomosis using double-stapling technique in robotic resection of rectal and sigmoid colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Robotic three-dimensional magnified visual effects and field of view stabilization have enabled precise surgical operations. Intracorporeal anastomosis in right-sided colorectal cancer surgery is expected to shorten operation times, avoid paralytic ileus, and shorten wound lengths; however, there are few reports of intracorporeal anvil fixation for intestinal anastomosis in left-sided colorectal cancer surgery. Herein, we introduce a simple, novel procedure for using robotic purse-string suture (RPSS) in intracorporeal anastomosis with the double-stapling technique in rectal and sigmoid cancer surgery and report short-term outcomes. METHODS: From September 2022 to April 2024, 105 consecutive patients underwent robotic surgery with double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal or sigmoid colon cancer at our institution. Their data were retrospectively analyzed. Intracorporeal anastomosis with the double-stapling technique using RPSS was performed in 26 patients (the RPSS group), while the double-stapling technique anastomosis with extracorporeal anvil fixation was performed in 79 patients (the EC group). A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was performed (matching criteria: sex, age, body mass index (BMI), tumor location and tumor size) using a caliper 0.3. In the RPSS group, after tumor-specific or total mesorectal excision, specimens were extracted from the umbilical wound with simultaneous anvil placement in the body cavity. The oral colonic stump was robotically excised and robotically circumferentially stitched with 3-0 Prolene in all layers. After anvil insertion into the stump, the bowel wall of the colon was completely sewn onto the central rod of the anvil. Reconstructions were anastomosed using the double-stapling technique. RESULTS: The matched cohort contained 23 patients in each group. The RPSS group had significantly less bleeding than the EC group (p = 0.038). Super-low anterior resection (SLAR) in the RPSS group had shorter total operative times than those in the EC group (p = 0.045). The RPSS group experienced no perioperative complications greater than Clavien-Dindo grade III or any anastomosis-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: The RPSS technique can be performed safely without any anastomosis-related complications and reduces the total operative times in SLAR and blood loss through total robotic surgery. This may be a useful modality for robotic colorectal surgery.

Outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Robotic-assisted rectal surgery (RARS) and Laparoscopic-assisted rectal surgery are the two techniques that are increasingly used for rectal cancer, and both have their advantages and disadvantages. This meta-analysis will analyze the outcomes of both techniques to determine their relative performance and suitability. METHODS: An extensive search was carried out on PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar, followed by a meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess both approaches for rectal cancer. RESULTS: This meta-analysis is comprised of fifteen RCTs. The conversion to open surgery (RR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.38-0.74, P = 0.0002) was significantly lower in the RARS group. The outcomes like anastomotic leak, postoperative ileus, postoperative urinary retention (POUR), surgical site infection (SSI), and intra-abdominal abscess showed no significant difference between the two groups. The reoperation rate (RR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.34-0.95, P = 0.03) was lower in the robotic group. High heterogeneity was obtained when pooling data on operative time, length of hospital stay, and blood loss. Oncological outcomes, including local recurrence, the number of harvested lymph nodes (LN) and distal resection margin showed no significant distinction among both groups, while the positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) (RR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.49-0.91, P = 0.01) was lower in the RARS group. RARS demonstrated a significantly higher rate of total mesorectal excision (TME) (RR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.14, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: RARS is safe and feasible for rectal cancer patients and may be superior or equivalent to Laparoscopic-assisted rectal surgery, but high-standard, large-scale trials are required to determine the best approach.

Short-term outcomes after primary total mesorectal excision (TME) versus local excision followed by completion TME for early rectal cancer: population-based propensity-matched study.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer screening programmes have led to a shift towards early-stage colorectal cancer, which, in selected cases, can be treated using local excision. However, local excision followed by completion total mesorectal excision (two-stage approach) may be associated with less favourable outcomes than primary total mesorectal excision (one-stage approach). The aim of this population study was to determine the distribution of treatment strategies for early rectal cancer in the Netherlands and to compare the short-term outcomes of primary total mesorectal excision with those of local excision followed by completion total mesorectal excision. METHODS: Short-term data for patients with cT1-2 N0xM0 rectal cancer who underwent local excision only, primary total mesorectal excision, or local excision followed by completion total mesorectal excision between 2012 and 2020 in the Netherlands were collected from the Dutch Colorectal Audit. Patients were categorized according to treatment groups and logistic regressions were performed after multiple imputation and propensity score matching. The primary outcome was the end-ostomy rate. RESULTS: From 2015 to 2020, the proportion for the two-stage approach increased from 22.3% to 43.9%. After matching, 1062 patients were included. The end-ostomy rate was 16.8% for the primary total mesorectal excision group versus 29.6% for the local excision followed by completion total mesorectal excision group (P < 0.001). The primary total mesorectal excision group had a higher re-intervention rate than the local excision followed by completion total mesorectal excision group (16.7% versus 11.8%; P = 0.048). No differences were observed with regard to complications, conversion, diverting ostomies, radical resections, readmissions, and death. CONCLUSION: This study shows that, over time, cT1-2 rectal cancer has increasingly been treated using the two-stage approach. However, local excision followed by completion total mesorectal excision seems to be associated with an elevated end-ostomy rate. It is important that clinicians and patients are aware of this risk during shared decision-making.

The risk for rectal cancer recurrence and overall mortality is not increased in men previously diagnosed with prostate cancer: a report from the Swedish colorectal cancer registry.

INTRODUCTION: Limited data exists on oncological outcomes following rectal cancer surgery in men who have previously been diagnosed with prostate cancer (PC). This study aimed to assess overall mortality and rectal cancer recurrence in men previously diagnosed with PC who underwent bowel resection. METHODS: Data from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry identified men who had rectal cancer surgery between 2000 and 2016, and the National Prostate Cancer Registry was used to identify those with a prior PC diagnosis. Cox regression analysis with propensity score matching was employed for data analysis. The primary outcome was overall mortality. Secondary outcome was recurrence for rectal cancer. RESULTS: Out of 13,299 men undergoing bowel resection for rectal cancer between 2000 and 2016, 1130 had a history of PC. Overall mortality did not significantly differ between men with and without a prior PC diagnosis. Cox regression analyses with propensity score matching revealed that men with previously diagnosed low- or intermediate-risk (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.90) and high-risk PC (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.98) had lower overall mortality after rectal cancer surgery compared with men without a PC. There was no significant difference in rectal cancer recurrence between men with a previous low or intermediate-risk PC (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.74-1.14) or high-risk PC (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.52-1.01) compared with those without PC history. CONCLUSION: Men undergoing rectal cancer surgery with a previous diagnosis of prostate cancer do not experience an increased risk of rectal cancer recurrence or overall mortality compared with men without a previous history of prostate cancer.

[Super minimally invasive surgery changing the treatment paradigm for rectal cancer].

The treatment mode for patients with low rectal cancer (LRC) is still mainly surgical treatment. With the advancement of medical technology, the current surgical mode is more inclined towards super minimally invasive surgery (SMIS) that preserves organs and functions. SMIS belongs to organ preservation surgery, including non-full thickness and full-thickness resection under digestive endoscopy, laparoscopic or robotic full-thickness resection, and transanal minimally invasive surgery, which can cover all stages of TNM staging. The paper elaborates on the importance of preoperative accurate diagnosis and risk stratification in selecting appropriate SMIS methods, the new progress of imaging technology in accurately predicting lymph node metastasis, providing preoperative TNM staging and risk stratification, and guiding SMIS treatment. Finally, the paper introduces the SMIS surgical options for the treatment of LRC that have been developed and are currently in the clinical research stage, with the aim of maximizing the quality of life for LRC patients.

[Effect of Da Vinci robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal neoplasms].

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of Da Vinci robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (R-TAMIS) for rectal neoplasms. Methods: The patients of rectal neoplasms who underwent R-TAMIS and were regularly followed up at the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2021 to January 2024 were retropectively selected. Follow-up visits were conducted at 1, 2, and 4 weeks postoperatively, and then every 3 months until January 20, 2024. The perioperative situation, postoperative histopathological results, and follow-up status of the patients were observed. Results: A total of 17 patients were included, including 10 males and 7 females, aged 35-80 (59±13) years. Eleven patients underwent surgery using the da Vinci® Si robot, while 6 patients underwent surgery using the da Vinci® Xi robot. The height of the resected tumor from the anal verge [M (Q1, Q3)] was 3.5 (3.0, 3.8) cm. The total operative time was 55.0 (50.0, 55.0) minutes, the platform installation time was 32.5 (30.0, 35.0) minutes. The actual surgical operation time was 22.5 (20.0, 27.5) minutes. Intraoperative blood loss was 9.2 (5.0, 10.0) ml. The postoperative hospital stay was 3.2 (3.0, 3.8) days. The total treatment cost was (29 447±4 765) yuan. Two patients who achieved clinical complete remission after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy experienced incision dehiscence one week postoperatively, which was resolved after four weeks of rectal irrigation therapy. All surgical specimens were intact, and all resection margins were negative. A total of 44(31,73) weeks were followed up, without local recurrence or distant metastasis. Conclusion: Da Vinci robotic transanal minimally invasive local resection may be a safe and feasible treatment option for rectal neoplasms.

Distinct clinicopathological features of neuroendocrine liver metastases originating from the pancreas and rectum.

INTRODUCTION: Survival comparisons among patients with liver metastases from pancreatic and rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) were limited, and the efficacy of observation rules in patients undergoing hepatectomy for neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELMs) was unknown. This study aims to distinguish these characteristics and clarify the effects of the observation rules on NELMs. METHODS: Clinical data were separately collected from patients with pancreatic and rectal NELMs at medical centers in both Japan and China. The Japanese cohort followed the observation rules for the resection of NELMs. A comparative analysis was conducted on clinical characteristics and prognosis features such as overall survival time (OS) and disease-free survival interval (DFS-I). RESULTS: Enrollment included 47 and 34 patients from Japan and China, respectively. Of these, 69 and 12 patients had tumors originating from the pancreas and rectum, respectively. The OS time in patients undergoing primary tumor resection was significantly longer; however, the OS time between the patients undergoing and not undergoing radical resection of liver metastasis was the same. In asynchronous NELMs, patients with rectal (R)-NELMs showed a significantly higher proportion of type III NELMs. Additionally, the median DFS-I of asynchronous R-NELMs was longer than the recommended follow-up time, with 71.4% of them classified as G2. In the Japanese cohort, patients who adhered to the observation rules exhibited a longer median DFS after hepatectomy for NELMs compared with their counterparts. CONCLUSION: Although curative surgery is crucial for primary lesions, personalized approaches are required to manage NELMs. Extended overall follow-ups and shortened follow-up intervals are recommended for G2 stage rectal NETs. The observation rules for NELMs require further validation with a larger sample size.

Suture reinforcement using a modified cyanoacrylate glue to prevent anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: a prospective multicentre randomized trial : The Rectal Anastomotic seaL (ReAL) trial.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is the most frequent life-threating complication following colorectal surgery. Several attempts have been made to prevent AL. This prospective, randomized, multicentre trial aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nebulised modified cyanoacrylate in preventing AL after rectal surgery. METHODS: Patients submitted to colorectal surgery for carcinoma of the high-medium rectum across five high-volume centres between June 2021 and January 2023 entered the study and were randomized into group A (anastomotic reinforcement with cyanoacrylate) and group B (no reinforcement) and followed up for 30 days. Anastomotic reinforcement was performed via nebulisation of 1 mL of a modified cyanoacrylate glue. Preoperative features and intraoperative and postoperative results were recorded and compared. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID number NCT03941938). RESULTS: Out of 152 patients, 133 (control group, n = 72; cyanoacrylate group, n = 61) completed the follow-up. ALs were detected in nine patients (12.5%) in the control group (four grade B and five grade C) and in four patients (6.6%), in the cyanoacrylate group (three grade B and one grade C); however, despite this trend, the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.36). However, Clavien-Dindo complications grade > 2 were significantly higher in the control group (12.5% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.04). No adverse effects related to the glue application were reported. CONCLUSION: The role of modified cyanoacrylate application in AL prevention remains unclear. However its use to seal colorectal anastomoses is safe and could help to reduce severe postoperative complications.

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a multicenter real-world study.

BACKGROUND: Owing to the lack of evidence-based medical studies with large sample sizes, the surgical approach for the radical resection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors remains controversial. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the medical records of patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors who underwent radical resection at 17 large tertiary care hospitals in China between January 1, 2010, and April 30, 2022. All patients were divided into laparoscopic and open surgery groups. After propensity score matching to reduce confounders, the postoperative and oncologic outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: We enrolled 174 patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors who underwent radical surgery. After random matching, 124 patients were included in the comparison (62, laparoscopic surgery group; 62, open surgery group). The laparoscopic surgery group had fewer complications (14.5% vs. 35.5%, P = 0.007) and superior relapse-free survival (P = 0.048). Subgroup analysis revealed that the laparoscopic surgery group had fewer complications (10.9% vs. 34.7%, P = 0.004), shorter postoperative hospital stays (9.56 ± 5.21 days vs. 12.31 ± 8.61 days, P = 0.049) and superior relapse-free survival (P = 0.025) in the rectal neuroendocrine tumors ≤ 4 cm subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery was associated with improved postoperative outcomes and oncologic prognosis for patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors ≤ 4 cm; it can serve as a safe and feasible option for radical surgery of rectal neuroendocrine tumors.

[Anorectal melanoma: Clinical case]. / Melanoma anorrectal: un caso clínico.

Background: Anorectal melanoma (AM) is a rare and aggressive type of tumor, with varied and inconclusive scientific information. Its preoperative diagnosis is challenging due to its rarity and similarity to other anorectal conditions. It represents only 1.3% of melanomas and affects more women than men. Approximately 20-30% of AM cases are amelanotic, complicating endoscopic detection and leading to misdiagnoses. AM is often confused with hemorrhoids, polyps, and rectal cancer in two thirds of patients due to similar symptoms. The causes and risk factors of AM are not well understood, but they are suspected to differ from cutaneous and ocular melanomas. Diagnosis is performed through biopsy and immunohistochemical staining. Colonoscopy helps to characterize the lesions, and histological examination is crucial for definitive diagnosis. Clinical case: 50-year-old woman with rectal bleeding and proctalgia. AM was diagnosed through colonoscopy, and transanal resection with hemorrhoidectomy was performed. Conclusions: Management of AM is complicated by the lack of randomized trials. Resection surgery is the standard treatment, but there is no established protocol. Wide local excision may be an option for limited cases. Further research is needed to improve the management and treatment of AM. Early detection and complete surgical removal are crucial for enhancing survival in these patients.

Introducción: el melanoma anorrectal (MA) es un tipo raro y agresivo de tumor, cuya información científica es variada y poco concluyente. Su diagnóstico preoperatorio es un desafío debido a su rareza y a su similitud con otras afecciones anorrectales. Representa solo el 1.3% de los melanomas y afecta más a mujeres que a hombres. Aproximadamente el 20-30% de los casos de MA son amelanóticos, lo que complica su detección endoscópica y conduce a diagnósticos erróneos. El MA se confunde con hemorroides, pólipos y cáncer de recto en dos tercios de los pacientes debido a síntomas similares. Las causas y factores de riesgo del MA aún no se conocen bien, pero se sospecha que son diferentes de los melanomas cutáneos y oculares. El diagnóstico se realiza mediante biopsia y tinción inmunohistoquímica. La colonoscopía permite caracterizar las lesiones y el examen histológico es crucial para el diagnóstico definitivo. Caso clínico: mujer de 50 años con rectorragia y proctalgia. Se diagnosticó MA mediante colonoscopía y se realizó una resección transanal con hemorroidectomía. Conclusiones: el manejo del MA es complicado por la falta de ensayos aleatorizados. La cirugía de resección es el tratamiento habitual, pero no hay un protocolo establecido. La escisión local amplia puede ser una opción para casos limitados. Se necesita más investigación para mejorar el manejo y tratamiento del MA. La detección temprana y la extirpación quirúrgica completa son cruciales para mejorar la supervivencia en estos pacientes.

Omentoplasty versus cecal mobilization after abdominoperineal resection: A propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Despite the minimally invasive approach and early rehabilitation, abdominal-perineal resection (APR) remains a procedure with high morbidity, notably due to postoperative trapped bowel ileus and perineal healing complications. Several surgical techniques have been described for filling the pelvic void to prevent abscess formation and ileus by trapped bowel loop. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to compare the post APR complications for cancer of two of these techniques, omentoplasty and cecal mobilization, in a single-center study from an expert colorectal surgery center. PATIENTS: From 2012 to 2022, 84 patients were included, including 58 (69%) with omentoplasty and 26 (31%) with cecal mobilization. They all underwent APR at Bordeaux University Hospital Center. SETTINGS: A propensity score was used to avoid confounding factors as far as possible. Patient and procedure characteristics were initially comparable. RESULTS: The 30-day complication rate was significantly higher in the cecal mobilization group (53.8% vs. 5.2% p < 0.01), as was the rate of pelvic abscess (34.6% vs. 0% p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that, when feasible, omentoplasty should be considered the preferred method for pelvic reconstruction following APR.

Low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in robotic mid-low rectal cancer surgery: a comparative study from a single-center.

Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision is the main surgical approach for treating rectal cancer, but there is still no clear consensus on the issue of low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery during the procedure. Robotic surgery has been shown to have certain advantages over laparoscopic surgery in multiple studies, but further research is needed to better understand the outcomes of robotic surgery in the context of low ligation procedures. In this study, we included 1590 patients with mid-low rectal cancer. Among them, 942 patients underwent low ligation surgery (LL), divided into 138 in the robotic group and 804 in the laparoscopic group. The high ligation surgery (HL) group consisted of 648 patients. The results of LL vs HL showed that the LL group had faster bowel movement recovery (P = 0.003), lower anastomotic leak rate (P = 0.032), and lower International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.001). The results of Rob-LL vs Lap-LL showed that the Rob-LL group had longer operative time (P < 0.001), less blood loss (P = 0.001), more lymph nodes retrieved (P = 0.045), and lower Wexner score at 2 weeks postoperatively (P = 0.029). The concept of low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery is a promising surgical approach that can accelerate the patient's functional recovery. When combined with robotic technology, it may offer more benefits than laparoscopic techniques.

Cost-Effectiveness of Routine Histopathological Analysis of Doughnuts after Colorectal Surgery Three-Year Single-Centre Experience.

Aim: This study aimed to assess the impact of routine histological examination of stapled colorectal anastomotic doughnuts in patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery (RCS). Justification of biopsy examination could form part of the strategies of NHS net zero practice with effort to reduce wastage and carbon footprint. Method: A data analysis of all patients undergoing RCS during 2019-2021 at our institute was performed. We also analysed the cost of preparing and reviewing histology slides. Results: 52 patients underwent anterior resection during the aforementioned period. Doughnuts were sent in 37 (71%) patients. 23 (62%) patients were male, and 14 (38%) were female. The median age at diagnosis was 68 (range 54-84) years. All resected specimens were adenocarcinomas. Of the 37 patients, 18 (49%) underwent low anterior resection and 19 (51%) underwent high anterior resection. Proximal doughnuts were sent in 26 (70%) patients, whereas distal doughnuts were sent in all cases. Mean distal microscopic resection margin from tumour was 22 mm (range 6-45 mm). Each doughnut required 3 slides, each costing £50 and requiring 82 minutes to fix and read. This incurred a cost of £13,650 and required 19,656 hours of preparation time. All of the doughnuts as well as resection margins were negative for malignancy. Conclusion: Routine histopathological examination of doughnuts is time and cost-intensive however provides little or no clinical value (particularly analysis of the proximal doughnut). Distal doughnuts should only be sent for histological examination in exceptional circumstances.